HARTFORD, Conn. -- Descendants of some of the 11 people executed for witchcraft in mid-1600s Connecticut are hoping for a little magic of their own: that Gov. Dannel P. Malloy will issue a proclamation clearing their distant relatives’ names and condemning the prosecutions and killings.
Over the past seven years, descendants and their supporters have been trying to get state officials to denounce the Con necticut witch trials, which began in 1647, three decades before the more famous trials in Salem, Mass., and ended in 1697. About 46 people were prosecuted, according to a 2006 state report.
"They were wrongly ac cused. It’s a justice issue," said Debra Lynne of New Milford, who says her great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandmother, Mary San ford, was hanged for witchcraft in Hartford in 1662.
The first person executed in the New World for witchcraft was Alice Young of Windsor, Conn., who was hanged in Hartford in 1647, according to several books on the trials. The last executions were in 1662.
Many historians believe fear was a major driver of Connec ticut’s witch trials, according to the state report. Deeply re ligious colonists who endured years of fighting with Native Americans, floods and sickness may have been looking for someone to blame for their hardships, the report said.
Historians say laws against witchcraft stemmed from passages in the Bible.
Lynne’s ancestor, Mary San ford, and her husband, An drew, were accused of witchcraft in 1662, according to court records obtained by Lynne’s cousin.
They were also accused of having knowledge of "secrets in a preternatural way be yond the ordinary course of nature to the great disturbance of several members of this commonwealth."
A grand jury couldn’t agree on the indictment against Andrew Sanford and he was acquitted. But Mary Sanford was convicted and ordered executed.
While officials in Massachu setts, Virginia and Hampton, N.H., have posthumously pardoned and exonerated ac cused witches, their counterparts in Connecticut have shown interest but taken no action.
Resolutions were proposed in the state Legislature in 2008 and 2009 but never made it out of committee. The governor’s office said he doesn’t have the authority to pardon anybody, and the state Board of Pardons and Paroles doesn’t issue posthumous pardons.
Advocates now think they have an answer: a gubernatorial proclamation.
Anthony Griego of Ham den, a 70-year-old retired po lice officer and pagan, re quested the proclamation in February. He said he’s only received an acknowledgment that the governor’s office re ceived his request. In August, he launched an online effort asking people to write to Malloy.
"In the 1600s, most of these people didn’t have defense attorneys," said Griego, who’s been working on the exoneration effort since 2005. "I think they were wrongly convicted. I think they died for a ridiculous reason."
Malloy spokesman David Bednarz reiterated in an email that the governor doesn’t have the authority to do what Grie go and others are asking. But the governor’s website invites residents to request proclamations, though it says he’ll issue them as his discretion.
Lynne supports Griego’s effort and isn’t discouraged by the response of the governor’s spokesman.
"It’s been 350 years that this has been waiting to happen," she said, "and for me there’s always hope."