People shouldn't have to suffer

Saturday October 27, 2012

I am confused as to why anyone would not vote Yes on Question 2. The passage of this "End of Life" question only gives a terminally ill person the option, the choice, to end their suffering if that is what they want. In reference to Robin Greenspan’s letter of Oct. 25, no one could force a terminally ill patient to end their life, it is completely voluntary. Her mother-in-law could choose whether or not to request doctor assisted end-of-life.

My mother was terminally ill and in abject misery for months before she died. Her pain was such that no amount of anti-pain mediation gave her relief. All she wanted was to die. She had a wonderful and happy life and this horrible, and prolonged, ending was unbearable for her. During this time I had to have a favorite pet put down. My mother asked why we are permitted to be kinder to our pets than to our parents?

A Yes vote on Question 2 only gives people a choice. The requirements for both patient and doctors are strict and involved. Why would we force people to continue suffering for months if they choose not to?


Great Barrington


If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.

Powered by Creative Circle Media Solutions