To the editor: School is starting up again soon and, no doubt, there'll be many smiling faces bright with the promise of new beginnings and renewing friendships.
However, looming over the potential of all remains the dreaded MCAS test, lording over the curriculum and the joy of experiencing the diversity of people, interests and expression.
Nevertheless, life is full of tests. There are various kinds for various purposes. Some are good, and some are not. (Think of the history of voter registration tests). Thankfully, Massachusetts voters will be voting in November on whether to continue to demand that students pass the MCAS test to receive a high school diploma. This snapshot of student performance in several academic areas can certainly have a profound effect on the future of students. Is the picture portrayed by a test score indicative of the person and his/her capabilities? How many people are much more than a score, and how can they demonstrate that on a computerized test? Are months and millions of dollars dedicated to test prep and administration a wise, inspiring and productive use of time, talent and resources?
The community, the classroom, the laboratories, the playing fields and the various canvasses of artistic expression undoubtedly provide for a more developed picture of a person's ability and potential for success rather than a machine. Surely, a professional faculty with years of experience in educating young people can provide a more comprehensive assessment of a student's abilities, performance and potential. However, a computerized test is quicker, impersonal and easier to stratify. Interestingly, the stratification appears to have a correlation with family income and ZIP code, which affirms that the impediments on the road to a better future will continue. If only the millions dedicated to the testing industry could be deferred to the schools and student experiences, perhaps the road to a brighter future would be smoother.
The Massachusetts Teachers Association is advocating for a yes vote on Question 2 to decouple the MCAS test from a graduation requirement. By voting yes on Question 2, you will enable the test to be used diagnostically and not punitively, which would align it with a helpful purpose to assist in the growth of students and not stunt their opportunities to demonstrate who they are and how they can contribute to a more productive society. We urge the electorate to vote yes on this test (Question 2) in November.
Neil Clarke, Lee
The writer is the Senate district coordinator for the Massachusetts Teacher Association.