Thomas L. Friedman: Don't ease off on blanket coverage of Trump

Posted
NEW YORK — Some healthy soul searching is taking place in newsrooms across the country these days over whether the mainstream media should be covering President Donald Trump's every tweet and rally. My answer: Absolutely! It's the right thing for us to do professionally, and, as this week's election results indicated, it's the right thing to do politically if you want to see a check on Donald Trump's power.

It appears that it's the toxic lying, bullying and unpresidential behaviors that Trump exhibits most in his rallies and tweets — which we in the media so incessantly cover — that is turning off the very moderate, best-educated Republicans and suburban women that Trump will need to hold the GOP majority in the House, let alone get re-elected.

So bring on the coverage.

Thinking Republicans

In a special election in Ohio held Tuesday, the GOP House candidate — whom Trump and the entire Republican establishment went to bat for — is barely ahead of his Democratic rival in a district that has not sent a Democrat to Congress in more than three decades.

That does not speak well for Trump or his midterm prospects, but it does for the American people and for thinking Republicans. It turns out there is still a cohort of Republicans who have not sold their souls to Trump the way virtually every one of their elected representatives in Washington has done.

It turns out that there are thinking Republicans for whom character, decency and truth-telling still matter in a president. It turns out that there are thinking Republicans who have watched Trump's twitter rants, his disturbed performance at Helsinki and the unrestrained bile that he emits at his rallies — and the blind, ecstatic response of his core base — and found them unnerving and unworthy of their support. That is what the polls and polling stations are telling us.

Imagine how well Trump would be doing if he weren't Donald Trump — if he weren't such a lying jerk.

But that is exactly what he is. So bring on the coverage.

The very applause lines and abusive and divisive behaviors that appeal to his base turn off more-moderate and more-educated suburban Republicans, and do nothing to attract independents or conservative Democrats.

I want wall-to-wall coverage of Trump's every speech, rally, tweet and utterance, because they most reveal his character, and Trump's character is the ceiling on Trump's presidency..

Yes, I want every American to know that two Trump supporters were spotted at the president's last rally, in Ohio, wearing T-shirts that read, "I'd rather be Russian than a Democrat." That's whom you're voting with when you vote for Trump.

I want every American to hear of Trump's tweet that CNN's anchor Don Lemon, who is African-American, was "the dumbest man on television" and that Lemon made LeBron James "look smart, which isn't easy to do." Lemon was interviewing James about a school he had just opened in Ohio for underprivileged children.

I want every Republican running for office to hear every syllable of Trump's bullying arrogance, when he warned at his Ohio rally that he destroys any GOP politician who dares to defy him, saying, "I only destroy their career because they said bad things about me and you fight back and they go down the tubes — and that's OK." Though these words do rally Trump's base, they also rally Democrats and evidently embarrass Republican moderates and alienate independents.

Veteran pollster Stanley Greenberg told me that he's seeing signs of this is in his recent focus groups: One was with moderate Republicans, all of whom "were put off'' by Trump's behavior. In addition, Greenberg said, the full Trump — insulting black sports heroes, threatening conservatives who dare cross him, praising Vladimir Putin and attacking the FBI — "reminds evangelical conservatives of the devil's bargain they made in supporting him. Seeing him in all of his overreach and mania and self-absorption doesn't make them second-guess their choice, but it makes them uncomfortable about it.''

In a close election it doesn't take many uncomfortable moderate Republicans to just stay home to make a big difference. That's all I am looking for, not a tsunami — that's not in the cards. Just a little wave of disgust among GOP moderates is all that is needed to turn several key districts from red to blue.

Better than this man

No question that the press should not allow itself to be props at Trump's rallies, and that can be dealt with by using a single pool camera that feeds all the networks, or reporters just sitting among the rally attendees, not in a special pen.

But the whole country needs to see every tweet, every rally, every word and every reaction so that they can ask themselves: "Is this who I want my kids to see as our president? Are these the people with whom I want to be aligned?" It's too late to move Trump's core base on these questions, but I would not give up on his passive supporters. The latest polls and special elections tell us we shouldn't.

I still believe that plenty of Americans of all political stripes are better than this president and that when given their next chance to say so, they will. Will there be enough? I don't know.

I just know that the GOP Congress and Fox News are too compromised to ever tell Trump, "Enough.'' But there are decent Republican moderates who, while they may never pull the lever for a Democrat, just might get too disgusted to vote. It's the best hope. So let's keep them fully informed about our president.

Thomas L. Friedman writes for The New York Times.


TALK TO US

If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.



Powered by Creative Circle Media Solutions